MA (TESOL) Neil Hammond How can Multiple Intelligence Theory be used to foster tutor development, support, and informed curriculum supplementation? March 3 years ago
PREFACE The writing of this dissertation represents the end of an extremely fulfilling process of query, and ideally the beginning of an equally rewarding process of software. I i am indebted towards the inspiring educating staff for EF Vancouver, especially to ELT experienced Victor Hillside who provided an invaluable sounding board pertaining to conceptual, syntactical and, it should be admitted, orthographical issues. Sigrid Mundy as well provided very much appreciated editorial assistance. Bless you also for the TESOL faculty at Sheffield Hallam University or college, and the members of TES 14 with whom I had been lucky to share in these kinds of rich collaborative development. I would like to appreciate my wife, Keona, for her understanding and reassurance during all of the moments I was lost in space; and finally my baby Jack pertaining to the continuous, but charming, distraction.
ABSTRACT The application of Multiple Pensee Theory in English Terminology Teaching frequently relies, it would seem, more over a leap of religion than about grounded analysis. Consequently, this kind of research looks for to examine the usage of Multiple Intellect Theory in a six-month instructor development job in a teachers of twenty teachers at a private terminology school in Vancouver, Canada. Initially the development project searched for to start, foster and track expertise transfer in the faculty by simply grouping teachers with different Multiple Cleverness profiles and inspiring peer preparing, observation and feedback. Actually, this goal was based upon the common assumption that instructors teach for their own intelligences. This was identified to be, itself, a to some extent groundless start of faith and led to a reframing in the project and ultimately an attempt to suggest how Multiple Intelligences Theory can be more successfully applied to English Vocabulary Teaching. While the teacher-development job was being examined qualitatively through open questionnaires, quantitative research was conducted into the dependability of Multiple Intelligence quick-tests. This was experimented with via inter-observer and alternate-form testing. One of the most revealing strand of the examine was to examine the intelligence bias natural both in coursebook and tutor supplementary materials. A strong amount of correlation was found between your chosen Multiple Intelligence quicktest and the alternate-form instruments. The inter-observer method revealed an 83. 2% correlation, and while such tests should be used cautiously, a fundamental indication of reliability was tentatively set up. The coursebook and teacher-supplement analysis featured the absolute weight of logicbased activities present in coursebooks and while linguistic, logical, interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligences are very well catered pertaining to, the remaining five intelligences usually ii
comprise less than 25% of activities. It is contended that in most ESL contexts this equilibrium is bad. More surprisingly, supplementary activities chosen or perhaps created by teachers follow precisely the routine found in coursebooks indicating that instructors unconsciously instruct to an unspoken yet pervasive common standard that outweighs personal proclivities. This trend may be counter-balanced by an awareness of how Multiple Intelligence Theory may be triggered in the ESL classroom simply by an awareness of the intrinsic, thematic, active and activity applications of each intelligence. The investigation challenges the present literature on Multiple Pensee in ELT that exaggerates rather than balances the prevalent intelligence opinion in published materials, and also challenges the assumption that вЂteachers educate to their intelligences'. The research endeavors to provide a crystal clear model to get immediate class room application and appears towards a synthesis of Multiple Intelligence Theory with Task-Based Learning.
References: AND BIBLIOGRAPHY Bandler, Ur., Grinder, T. (1979), Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming. Real People Press. Berman, M (1998), A Multiple Intelligences Road to an ELT. Wales: Crown House Branton Shearer, C. (2004), вЂUsing a Multiple Intelligences Evaluation to Promote Tutor Development and Student Achievement'. Teachers University Record 106: 1C: 147 Branton Shearer, C. (2005), вЂWhich Multiple Intelligences Assessment is Appropriate to your Purposes? '. www.miresearch.org/files p2-3 Christison, M. A. (1998), Applying Multiple Intelligences Theory. Forum thirty-six: 2: 2 Cunningham, S. and Moor, P. (2005), New Leading edge Upper Advanced. Harlow: Longman Di Maio, M (2003), вЂUsing multiple intelligences in the EFL classroom'. Lang Matters, Issue 6th Gardner, L. (1983), Frames of head: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1993), Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Simple Books. Gardner, H. (1999), Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New york city: Basic Literature. Gardner, G (2003), вЂMultiple Intelligences Following Twenty Years'. Invited Treat, American Educational Research Connection Gardner, L. (2004), Changing Minds. MA: Harvard Business School Press Gardner, H. (2006), Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons. New york city: Basic Catalogs Howell, T. M. and Fresco, A (2003), Content, Lang Issues, 6: 1-3 Keirsey, G. and Bates, M. (1984), Please Understand Me: Character and Nature Types. Prometheus Nemesis Knight M. In. (2003), http://student.vwc.edu/~nmknight/portfolio.htm Marchiori, D. et ing (2006) [email protected] (2nd Edition), Amsterdam: EF Education Luft, J. (1969), Of Human being Interaction. Tranca Alto. FLORIDA: National Press McKenzie, Watts. (1999), Multiple Intelligences Inventory, http://surfaquarium.com/MI/inventory.htm Myers, I (1962), Introduction to Type. Oxford: Specialists Press
Palmberg, L (2002), вЂCatering for Multiple Intelligences in EFL Coursebooks'. Humanising Terminology Teaching, Yr 4: you Prabhu, N. S. (1987), Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: College or university Press Rinvolucri, M. and Puchta, They would. (2005), Multiple Intelligences in EFL. Helbling Languages Silver, H; Rich, S; Perini, M (1997), вЂIntegrating learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences', Educational Command, 55: you: 22-27 Sterling silver, H; Rich, S; Perini, M (2000), So Every single May Find out. VA: ASCD Soars, M. and Increases, J. (2001), New Points English Training course. Oxford: OUP Tanner, L. (2001), вЂTeaching Intelligently', English language Teaching Specialist, 20: 40-41 Wingate, Meters (1997), вЂMultiple Intelligences and Lesson Planning'. English Educating Professional, two: 28-30 MI quick evaluation key (From section several. 1 . 2) (LDP) www.LDPride.net (MAC)McKenzie, Watts (1999) (see above) (MB) Berman, M (1998) (see above) (MIDAS) Branton, Shearer (2005) (see above)